Ir para o conteúdo
Mostrar cesto Esconder cesto
Voltar a Blog
Tela cheia

What is Enlightenment? The teachings of Mark Hoffmeister and ACIM

2 de Dezembro de 2023, 5:33 , por Benjamin Tenison - 0sem comentários ainda | Ninguém está seguindo este artigo ainda.
Visualizado 4 vezes

Thanks for wondering the questions that can come to your brain, even if they seem "instead peculiar" to you. In Enlightenment all perceived suffering has vanished, for what but wrong-mindedness appeared to create the misperception called pain.

Suffering was the impression that Christ can leave a Supportive Creator's Mind. "If pain is real there is no God. If Lord is actual there is number pain."(W-190.3) The latter holds true because God does not have any opposite. Enlightenment entails no pain or displeasure about ANYTHING, for Enlightenment is Genuine, Constant Happiness, Peace, Freedom, and Joy. Being Regular, Enlightenment knows not of acim change. The illusion of susceptibility and varying feelings moved as well. There's number vanity to fall "right back into." Soul Abides in light Love. All suffering has ended Now and nothing remains but a blessing of Stillness.

The Sacred Soul is the note that Living is Eternal. The Present Moment is the gateway to Eternity. The world of photos was a world of illusion. Pictures are thus neutral to the Holy Spirit. They certainly were "neutralized" the quick they did actually arise.

What does that mean in terms of your next question? You cannot eliminate what's never lived, and in the Holy Spirit's Perception of forgiveness harm is impossible. Figures were never born and never die because the planet of pictures may be the past. It's impossible to get beginnings and endings in a script that is already written and over extended ago.

There's number living in images. Here is the meaning of "Maintain no graven images before the Lord Thy God." All photographs were made to obscure the Reality from recognition, and they are able to only be forgiven as one illusion. If illusions might be separated up into living and useless, natural and inorganic, animate and inanimate Enlightenment will be impossible. For what's Enlightenment but Real Oneness, much beyond the likelihood of team of any kind? The separate brain was the illusion. Find not to project

the separate brain to types and contact some types living and some forms dead. God knows perhaps not form. The split brain was the "killer" dream, the Sacred Heart reminds the resting brain that what is full and specific can never BE split. In Paradise Brain is One Soul, and even pertaining to this world forgiveness reflects that Oneness. The forgiven earth recognizes the unity of the relieved mind and considers that there is nothing "outside" of the simple mind which dreams gently a pleased, mild dream. The target of ACIM would be to dream lightly of a sinless world. That purpose is more than possible, it's certain!

In terms of my seeming diet, "consume what is served" may be the Guidance I was given from the Sacred Spirit a long time ago. Join along with your brother and allow no notion come involving the Love you share. That Guidance has not changed. "Dinner" is obviously a history for sharing the Delight of the Residing Moment. What the planet calls "breathing" and "eating" and "drinking" and "sleeping" are very the same in the Enlightened State. The Relieved Perception sees the sameness of everything since all of them share the same Purpose: forgiveness. That Perspective isn't "particular," for in good understanding nothing is personal. Lord is no respecter of persons. I practically can not "take" an animal's "life" because Life is Soul and can just only be extended or Given as God Gives. "Take" has no indicating within my brain and because creatures have never "lived" it is impossible that they could "die." The opinion expressed in thinking "personally take an animal's life" has several underlying assumptions which can be false. In right-mindedness it is evident that ideas are increased because they are provided out or shared, and "taking" a "life" or anything at all has no meaning. All that I provide is fond of mySelf, and in providing there is number loss, no lose, and nothing is actually taken away from wholeness and unity. The teacher of God does not want something that can not be given away. Such is the Pleasure of miracles! The thought vegetables seem to be flung every where, yet there's never even a view back to see where in actuality the seeds land. The seeds are never for an "other," and because giving and obtaining are exactly the same the mind gets the gifts it gives. This is really the party you find for underneath the ego's questions.

The only real question that want be requested is really a question that's not really ridiculous at all: Am I ready to learn that God's Can and My Own are the Same? God's Will for Me is for Great Happiness. And what but this Will is the Can of Christ? Cheerfully, nothing can change Eternal Love. Thank You Lord!


0sem comentários ainda

    Enviar um comentário

    Os campos são obrigatórios.

    Se você é um usuário registrado, pode se identificar e ser reconhecido automaticamente.

    Cancelar

    Benjamin Tenison

    0 amigos

    Nenhum(a)